Monday, December 26, 2011

Afghanistan cabinet OKs oil deal with China?s CNPC (Reuters)

KABUL (Reuters) ? Afghanistan?s cabinet cleared the way for the war-torn state to sign a deal with China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) for the development of oil blocks in the Amu Darya basin, the Afghan president?s office said on Monday.

The deal covering drilling and a refinery in the northern provinces of Sar-e Pul and Faryab will be the first international oil production agreement entered into by the Afghan government for several decades.

It marks the second major deal for China in Afghanistan after Metallurgical Corp of China signed a contract in 2008 to develop the huge Aynak copper mine south of Kabul, which is due to start producing by the end of 2014.

?The Afghan cabinet has ordered Mines Minister Wahidullah Shahrani to sign an oil exploration contract for Amu Darya with China National Petroleum Corporation,? the statement said.

Jawad Omar, a spokesman for the mines ministry, said the contract would be signed on Wednesday.

State-owned CNPC and joint venture partner Watan Group ? a diversified Afghan company ? will explore for oil in three fields in the basin ? Kashkari, Bazarkhami and Zamarudsay, which are estimated to hold around 87 million barrels of oil.

Under the contract, CNPC will agree to pay a 15 percent royalty on oil, a 20 percent corporate tax and give up to 70 percent of its profit from the project to the Afghan government.

The mines ministry said in October that the deal was likely to result in government revenues of $ 5 billion over the next 10 years.

Indian and Chinese bidders have been front-runners for deals to develop Afghanistan?s vast mineral deposits, which are valued at $ 3 trillion, worrying Western firms that have hesitated to invest in the country due to security concerns.

Experts have warned that mining projects in Afghanistan are likely targets for insurgents, that production and transport costs will be high and that sovereign risk is a serious concern.

But China and India, where demand for energy and industrial inputs is booming, are willing to take risks to secure supplies.

(Writing by Agnieszka Flak; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani and Jane Baird)

Yahoo! News: World ? China

You might also be interested in:

  1. China?s CNPC says Iraqi oil field now onstream (AFP)
  2. Afghanistan Says Help Needed to Deal With Foreign Threats
  3. Analysis: China seeks profit, shuns politics, in Afghanistan (Reuters)
  4. Roadside bomb kills 15 in southern Afghanistan (AP)
  5. Afghanistan, Pakistan agree to implement transit trade accord (Reuters)

Source: http://libaw.com/christian-media-cross/china-2/afghanistan-cabinet-oks-oil-deal-with-chinas-cnpc-reuters/

newt gingrich chicago bears margarito margarito horton hears a who horton hears a who cotto margarito

Rental Villas for a Destination Wedding in Jamaica

Rental Villas for a Destination Wedding in Jamaica

Published on Friday, 23 December 2011


Destination weddings require even more precise planning than weddings held in the couple's hometown. So many things can go wrong and it is more challenging to find people to fix little quirks here and there in unfamiliar surroundings. Often, by carefully choosing the wedding's location, the couple can almost certainly avoid those quirks since rental villas that specifically cater to weddings will have their own event planners.
Golden Cove Villas, Ocho Rios
Golden Cove is a beautiful 11-acre complex. It boasts of 3 4-bedroom luxury rental villas that can each accommodate up to 8 guests. The estate sits right on the edge of the Carribean Sea, overlooking its own private cove. Each villa has its own gated compound, very private and peaceful, with its own beachfront! The holiday villas can be rented individually or all at the same time for special events like weddings and reunions. For weddings, the couple can invite their nearest and dearest and accommodate them all in style as a thank you gesture for sharing the most memorable event in their lives.Button Bay Beach Getaway, Treasure Beach
This grand holiday villa has 12 bedrooms! Almost like a tropical castle in its grandeur! It is a long way away on the South Coast of the island, but it is well worth the journey. It is this apparent seclusion from the maddening crowds that sets this property apart as a destination wedding venue. The wedding party can choose to stay exclusively here and still have enough wonderful memories to bring back home with them.
Silent Waters, Montego Bay
Silent Waters is amongst the most fabulous private holiday homes in the Caribbean, sitting on one of the highest points overlooking Montego Bay. It has 10 bedrooms and sleeps 22. This picturesque estate is all of 18 acres of lavish gardens, tranquil ponds and magnificent views, with a staff of 14. It is simply made for a destination wedding. There are 5 villa suites to house the wedding party guests. The owner's private villa will be for the newlyweds.
A wedding in Jamaica is somehow more magical and memorable. It is the top 2 most popular destination wedding location in the world. It's impressive portfolio of fabulous rental villas are a testament to this distinction.

Vacation Homes Around the World

Source: http://www.vacationhomes.net/category/holiday-homes/rental-villas-for-a-destination-wedding-in-jamaica-.html

death clock cerebral palsy lenny dykstra top chef texas stanley tucci stanley tucci x factor voting

MyDroidWorld: Merry Christmas From My Droir World ! http://t.co/MszPcaft #Android

  • Passer la navigation
  • Twitter sur votre mobile ? Cliquez ici m.twitter.com!
  • Passer cette ?tape
  • Connexion
Loader Twitter.com
  • Connexion
Merry Christmas From My Droir World ! tinyurl.com/86mw3na #Android MyDroidWorld

Pied de page

Source: http://twitter.com/MyDroidWorld/statuses/150651582353121281

art basel 2011 straight no chaser straight no chaser bcs standings bcs standings douglas fir jim boeheim

Proposal to Integrate Undocumented Immigrants in California

? Community Advisory: ADC Alarmed by Increase in Reported Complaints | Main | Representing Noncitizens in Civil Litigation 01/27/2012 ?

December 23, 2011

Proposal to Integrate Undocumented Immigrants in California

Here's an interesting integration idea outlined by the Mexican American Political Alliance:

Construction
The California Opportunity and Prosperity Act (COPA)
Help Restore California's Economy through Integrating Qualified Immigrants

Introduction
After fifteen years of bipartisan failure in D.C. to fix our broken immigration laws, it is time for California to lead the U.S. by example by enacting by ballot initiative a new law that gives qualified unauthorized residents who pay state income taxes the option to enter a program whose participants may gain relief from federal enforcement and whose labor may be decriminalized.

COPA Benefits to California's Budget and Society It is estimated that COPA could generate as many as a million new taxpayers1 who could contribute an estimated $325 millions of dollars annually in general revenue to California that will be used to fund desperately needed police and fire services, etc.

Summary
COPA does this by enacting a five year pilot, self-financed program in which participants gain entrance by meeting certain thresholds.

The participants are undocumented California residents who pay state income tax with a federal Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN); and can meet the following thresholds:

1. Have no felony convictions and are not suspected terrorists;

2. Know or are learning English;

3. Pay processing fee and provide a photo;

4. Are not public charges;

5. Have lived in California since before January 1, 2008;

COPA participants must continue to use a federal Individual Tax Identification Number to continue paying income taxes and pay annual renewal fee to remain in the program.

COPA directs California's Governor to petition the President and other federal agencies to: Provide relief and or exemptions from federal immigration enforcement actions against COPA members and their families; and decriminalize employment of COPA members.

Background
Conceptually, COPA is based upon successful elements of the bipartisan Immigration and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) signed by then-President Ronald Reagan. IRCA's most successful element or "General Legalization" program's eligibility criteria is replicated in the thresholds used for eligibility in COPA. COPA is enacted within the confines of the California Constitution, state and local law.

COPA follows successful efforts in California to enable qualified undocumented students to access private and state financial aid (AB130/AB131), and to end abusive police towing of vehicles owned by undocumented persons (AB353).

COPA continues the proud California tradition of trailblazing innovative US public policy as it has in the area of women's suffrage, environmental protection, and access to cannabis for medical uses.

1 According to a UCLA NAID Center research report by Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda and Marshall Fitz published in April 2011 with the Center for American Progress entitled "Revitalizing the Golden State What Legalization Over Deportation Could Mean to California and Los Angeles County", the undocumented population in California was estimated by the 2006-2008 American Community Survey (US Census Bureau) to be 2,700,000, of which 1.85 million were estimated to be employed in the work force, generating over 157 billion in Gross State Product of California. It is also estimated that there are an additional 500, 00 undocumented residents who are either under 18 or are family members of employed individuals.

Since net immigration flow have declined since the beginning of the crisis in 2007 to California and the U.S., it conservatively estimated that at least 75 to 85% of the estimated 2.6 million undocumented in California today could qualify under the terms of COPA.

Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who supports COPA?

COPA has a growing list of supporters. It was proposed by John Cruz of Orange County, a Republican and former Secretary of Appointments for Governor Schwarzenegger, and the Honorable Felipe Fuentes, a Democratic Assemblyman from the San Fernando Valley. COPA is also supported by members of the California Latino Legislative Caucus including Chairman Tony Mendoza, Asm. Ben Hueso, Asm. Manuel P?rez, Asm. Gil Cedillo, Sen. Ron Calder?n, and Sen. Kevin De Le?n.

In addition, COPA has the endorsement of Confederaci?n de Federaciones Mexicanas (COFEM), Latino/Latina Roundtable of Pomona and San Gabriel Valleys (LRT), Community Union (CU), Mexican American Political Association (MAPA), Hermandad Mexicana Latinoam?rica (HML), Anahuak Youth Sports Association (AYSA), William C. Velasquez Institute (WCVI), Southwest Voter Registration Education Project (SVREP), and the Latino Voters League (LVL).

2. What makes you think that COPA has a chance to succeed in California?

COPA's concept is very popular with the voters of all stripes according to our polls and focus groups, testing at more than 60% support. This includes Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.

California public opinion is leading the US towards reconciliation with immigrants. Californians have dealt with this issue for two decades are increasingly reaching a consensus for fair and humane treatment of immigrants.

3. How much revenue can COPA raise for California's General Fund?

Given the thresholds in COPA, 75% of California's undocumented population would be eligible to apply for status.

Implementing COPA could generate $325 million dollars in annual general fund revenue for California's state government as the new taxpayers come into the system.

4. What does COPA do?

COPA forms a five year pilot project that encourages certain immigrants to pay state income tax and potentially allows those who do to gain relief from federal enforcement and decriminalizes members' employment. Moreover it would pay for itself and allow immigrants to contribute to California's economy with their taxes and labor.

It would also lift the burden of illegality off COPA employers' shoulders as well as diminish the cheap labor pool.

It would help reset the national debate on federal immigration policy by showing that an inclusive rather than punitive policy framework is both more humane and effective.

Continue.

5. Who can join COPA?

Undocumented California residents who pay state income tax with a federal Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN)); and can meet the following thresholds:

1. Have no felony convictions and are not suspected terrorists;

2. Know or are learning English;

3. Pay processing fee and provide a photo;

4. Are not public charges;

5. Have lived in California since before January 1, 2008;

6. Isn't immigration reform a federal responsibility?

Yes. COPA doesn't deal with US borders, legalization, visas or US Citizenship. Those powers belong to the federal government. COPA simply says that persons duly qualified as Californians that meet the above requirements should have relief from federal enforcement and have their work decriminalized.

7. Shouldn't we wait for Congress or the President to act on immigration reform?

We have waited for fifteen years. We had been writing letters, marching and visiting our representatives in Washington, DC. And 2010's elections show that "immigration reform" will be log-jammed for at least another 4-6 years. Approving COPA will provide relief and fairness to qualified unauthorized immigrants in California now until federal reform is enacted at some point in the future.

Moreover COPA provides a political and policy response to SB1070 in Arizona which turbocharged an already existing anti-immigrant wave across the country, in essence overwhelming the immigrant rights movement. Approving COPA will prod Washington to enact a national reform program sooner than later.

8. Won't COPA be struck down in the courts?

Not at all. COPA leaves federal immigration prerogatives in place with regard to citizenship, entering/leaving the country, and border control. Any other conflicts with federal law can be handled by exemptions for California gained through engagement between Governor Brown and the White House.

One good example of COPA's legal theory is that of Medical Marijuana. According to federal law, consumption of marijuana is illegal. Yet 15 states have enacted laws permitting conditional medicinal consumption, and have withstood court challenge as well as Federal/Congressional scrutiny/intervention. As a result millions of Americans are now conditionally consuming medical marijuana in the fifteen states where it has been legislatively approved. States rights are real in the U.S. and have to be invoked in the cause of commonsense treatment of immigrants!

Want to learn more, Read the COPA initiative, and see our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)? Visit our webpage

at: http://www.caopportunity.com

bh

December 23, 2011 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0162fe46208f970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Proposal to Integrate Undocumented Immigrants in California:

Source: http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2011/12/proposal-to-integrate-undocumented-immigrants-in-california.html

bears lions bears lions neville neville heavy d heavy d taser gun

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Senator Risch selects Idaho nominees for U.S. Military Academics

(Updated 3:38 p.m.) - Dozens of young men and women made the nomination list for the United States Military Academics for the 2012 school year. The released list, featuring selections by Senator Jim Risch, covers all four academies: Air Force, Army, Marine and Navy.

This is just the first step of the selection process. Names marked in bold are North Idaho nominees.

U.S. Air Force Academy

  • Joseph Cardona III, Boise
  • Anthony deVera, Meridian
  • John French, Meridian
  • Kaylee Kostka, Heyburn
  • Adrianna Lutu, Boise
  • Kevin Miller, Idaho Falls
  • Zachary Morrow, Roswell
  • Jonathon Riggers, Nezperce
  • Nathaniel Rupp, Boise
  • Ronald Weimar, Payette

U.S. Military Academy at West Point (Army)

  • Adam Armour, Idaho Falls
  • Reid Boorman, Bonners Ferry
  • Layne Harper, Blackfoot
  • Joel ?Parker? Heisey, Coeur d?Alene
  • Colby Hyde, Eagle
  • Zachary LaBenne, Hayden
  • Parker Matthews, Rathdrum
  • Bryan Perry, Rigby
  • David Trompke, Eagle
  • Kristine Westergard, Boise

U.S. Merchant Marine Academy

  • Brennen Connolly, Meridian
  • Andrew Fletcher, Boise
  • Alex Foster, Ammon
  • Zane Hardin, McCall
  • Mason Menges, Nampa
  • Konnor-Lawrence Moden, Boise
  • Levi Sliwoski, Boise
  • Eric Whitman, Priest River
  • Kevin Wilmot, Jerome
  • Rebecca Winzer, Coeur d?Alene

U.S. Naval Academy

  • Nicholas Arnold, Boise
  • Hallie Bonnicksen, Kellogg
  • Andrew Brackebush, Silverton
  • Joseph Dlugosch, Eagle
  • Gaylen Edmo, Pocatello
  • John Foulger, Chubbuck
  • John ?Gil? Givens, Post Falls
  • Kylie Johnson, Coeur d?Alene
  • Skyler Means, Boise
  • Jonathon Riggers, Nezperce

Note: A reader pointed out that there was no nomination list for Coast Guard. After speaking with Senator Risch's Office in Washington D.C., they said that the Coast Guard academy does not need nominations.

Source: http://postfallsrathdrum.kxly.com/news/people/68823-senator-risch-selects-idaho-nominees-us-military-academics

williston north dakota kody brown transylvania terrell owens terrell owens carrie ann inaba california earthquake

Google+ Brand Pages Invade Search Results

This isn't exactly "new", it's been like this for a week or more but when you search for popular brands in Google's search results, if they have Google+ Brand pages - the search results for that brand will add the Google+ information.

The added details include:

  • Link to the Google+ Brand page
  • Most recent Google+ post
  • Most recent Google+ photo
Here is a picture of a search for [Macy's]:

Google+ Brand Pages SERPs

A WebmasterWorld thread is waiting for Google Product Search and +Brand pages to be combined where searches for products return not just product images but Google+ data from the merchant/brand.

Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld.

Source: http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/NaEPdjj8x3c/google-plus-brand-results-14490.html

kmart urban meyer ohio state traffic report traffic report opensky dia frampton dia frampton

Cricket Fight Club: Winning Increases Aggression

It?s better than an ant farm. It?s more exciting than a flea circus. Welcome to Cricket Fight Club. The first rule of Cricket Fight Club is: you do not talk about Cricket Fight Club. The second rule of Cricket Fight Club is: you do not talk about Cricket Fight Club.

In aggressive conflicts between individuals of the same species throughout the animal kingdom, losers become less aggressive while winners become more aggressive. In turn, winners become more likely to win subsequent fights, even against new opponents.

Why does this occur? One recent line of evidence (based on research in fish and mice) suggests that social conflicts result in an increase in testosterone levels, which in turn results in competitive behavior and aggression. The problem with this hypothesis is that the winner effect has been observed in both invertebrates as well as in vertebrates, which have very different physiological systems. Something other than testosterone might be responsible for the winner effect.

In order to investigate the source of the heightened aggression that results from the winner effect, researchers Jan Rillich and Paul Anthony Stevenson staged ?tournaments? of cricket fights, using Mediterranean field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). They set up a series of fights, with rest periods between fights that lasted either five minutes or twenty minutes.

The general pattern went something like this: first, two fight-inexperienced, weight-matched adult male crickets were allowed to fight. The winners from those fights were matched for a second round of fighting, and the round two winners participated in a third round. In addition to measuring how long each fight lasted (in seconds), the researchers measured how aggressive the encounters were, using the a scale from zero (avoidance) to six (full-contact wrestling).

When the inter-fight interval was limited to five minutes, they found that round three fights lasted longer (11 seconds) than round two fights (8 seconds), which were longer than round one fights (6 seconds). In addition, round three fights escalated to higher aggression levels, on average, than round one and two fights.

What was particularly interesting, however, was that these effects disappeared when the inter-fight interval was extended to twenty minutes. In other words, the ?winner effect? did not hold when there was a longer time to wait between fights.

And not only that. while round three fights were not significantly different from round one and two fights for crickets within the twenty minutes condition, there was a significant difference between conditions: round three fights in the twenty minute condition were significantly shorter and less aggressive than round three fights in the five minute condition.

At this point, you might ask whether the observed effects were possibly the result of fighting, per se, and not the result of winning those fights. The researchers wondered the same thing, so they conducted two more experiments. In the first, tournaments were conducted such that the crickets would fight, but the fights were broken up before there was a clear winner. In other words, it was fighting-without-winning. In the second, tournaments were conducted which paired fight-inexperienced crickets with previous losers, since the losers were more likely to retreat, and forfeit the match. In other words, it was winning-without-fighting. When comparing the results, the researchers discovered that winning-without-fighting maintained the previously observed winner effect, while fighting-without-winning did not (more specifically, though it did result in longer fight duration, there was not an increase in aggressiveness). This means that it the winning of a fight that is critical to the winner effect, not simply aggressive behavior. Aggression did not beget aggression in the absence of a win.

Now that they had established that the winner effect only holds when there is a short inter-fight interval, and that the winner effect is the result of winning rather than fighting itself, the next step was to determine its physiological basis. They staged another round of tournaments, all including the five minute rest period between fights. This time, however, they treated the crickets with one of four types of neurochemicals (or a placebo, for the control group), each of which was known to block certain types of receptors in the nervous systems of insects.

The control group, as expected, displayed the same winner effect that was seen in the first experiment. In addition, three of the four neurochemicals with which the crickets were dosed had no effect on cricket aggression. For all three treatments, the winner effect was maintained. The fourth neurochemical epinastine, which blocks the effects of octopamine did have an effect: not only was the winner effect abolished, but when comparing the round three fights with the control group?s round three fights, they were less aggressive and shorter in duration.

Taken together, these results show two important things.

First, that the increased aggressiveness seen after winning earlier fights is transient: the winner effect is seen when fights are separated by five minute rest periods, but not for twenty minute intervals.

Second, these experiments show that the winner effect is driven by a neurochemical called octopamine, which is the invertebrate version of norepinephrine, and part of the adrenaline system.

This leaves just one question: why did these researchers choose to study aggression in crickets in the first place? Simply put, concepts such as reward and motivation can be extremely complicated. The researchers argue, therefore, if we wish to understand ?how concepts such as reward and motivation can be encoded in the nervous system,? it makes sense to use a ?presumably non-conscious animal.?

There is, after all, a long history of investigating complex mental processes in simple nervous systems. For example, much of what we know about the molecular basis of memory comes from the study of the sea slug, Aplysia californica.

To that end, insects seem to be ideal critters for studying this sort of reward-associated hyper-aggression.

Reference:
Rillich, J., & Stevenson, P. (2011). Winning Fights Induces Hyperaggression via the Action of the Biogenic Amine Octopamine in Crickets PLoS ONE, 6 (12) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028891

Cricket photo via: Flickr/kevincollins123

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=6c275421e53cbe75db5b2c1e1b1cfdc2

beyonce dance for you beyonce dance for you nba lockout over gone with the wind nba lockout news nba lockout news gifts for mom